<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Track Of The Day: Gun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.classicrockmagazine.com/news/track-of-the-day-gun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.classicrockmagazine.com/news/track-of-the-day-gun/</link>
	<description>Classic Rock Magazine Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:40:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.classicrockmagazine.com/news/track-of-the-day-gun/comment-page-1/#comment-19077</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicrockmagazine.com/?p=25027#comment-19077</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think people get it. All bands evolve and this new EP is more commercial than the &#039;old Gun&#039; sound. That’s the way most bands go over time (Rush, Jovi, U2) and the reality is that they have to make some cash to keep the project alive. I like the EP, yes admittedly it’s not Gun of old, but who cares? The bands line up has changed and they&#039;ve moved on musically, it’s still Rock and I like it. This will sell to the youth and allows us &#039;oldies&#039; to hear the old stuff live. It will have you humming tracks right from the get go, buy it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think people get it. All bands evolve and this new EP is more commercial than the &#8216;old Gun&#8217; sound. That’s the way most bands go over time (Rush, Jovi, U2) and the reality is that they have to make some cash to keep the project alive. I like the EP, yes admittedly it’s not Gun of old, but who cares? The bands line up has changed and they&#8217;ve moved on musically, it’s still Rock and I like it. This will sell to the youth and allows us &#8216;oldies&#8217; to hear the old stuff live. It will have you humming tracks right from the get go, buy it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://www.classicrockmagazine.com/news/track-of-the-day-gun/comment-page-1/#comment-18997</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicrockmagazine.com/?p=25027#comment-18997</guid>
		<description>As a hard core fan of GUN, I have to admit im a bit disapointed... Ive been to see GUN 3 times on the new tour and have found them to be back to their glory with Toby almost - its great to see them again.... However the new music is as far away from the GUN sound as you can get, GUN were a hard edged, raw sounding, band with great hooks, I even approved of the 0141 album, but the new Popkiller ( I ordered it and it arrived today ) is sadly not GUN at all.... I will continue to see them for old times sake, but hope to hear the the classic GUN suond come back in any future releases</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a hard core fan of GUN, I have to admit im a bit disapointed&#8230; Ive been to see GUN 3 times on the new tour and have found them to be back to their glory with Toby almost &#8211; its great to see them again&#8230;. However the new music is as far away from the GUN sound as you can get, GUN were a hard edged, raw sounding, band with great hooks, I even approved of the 0141 album, but the new Popkiller ( I ordered it and it arrived today ) is sadly not GUN at all&#8230;. I will continue to see them for old times sake, but hope to hear the the classic GUN suond come back in any future releases</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tinman</title>
		<link>http://www.classicrockmagazine.com/news/track-of-the-day-gun/comment-page-1/#comment-18670</link>
		<dc:creator>tinman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicrockmagazine.com/?p=25027#comment-18670</guid>
		<description>Have to disagree with &#039;shufflemoomin&#039;.  GUN have just played to sold out crowds in Spain and in front of 4,000 in Portugal.   No point in living in the past you have to inovate... Go and see them live...  They are awesome with Toby...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have to disagree with &#8217;shufflemoomin&#8217;.  GUN have just played to sold out crowds in Spain and in front of 4,000 in Portugal.   No point in living in the past you have to inovate&#8230; Go and see them live&#8230;  They are awesome with Toby&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shufflemoomin</title>
		<link>http://www.classicrockmagazine.com/news/track-of-the-day-gun/comment-page-1/#comment-18234</link>
		<dc:creator>shufflemoomin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicrockmagazine.com/?p=25027#comment-18234</guid>
		<description>This track is proof why the nostalgia of once great bands coming back can be a trip down memory lane, but the new music is almost always a mistake. They were going way down hill towards the end with 0141 and they should have stayed down. This track is just candy-arsed, radio friendly pop s**t and as far from rock as you could possibly get. I see them fading away again very soon. Sadly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This track is proof why the nostalgia of once great bands coming back can be a trip down memory lane, but the new music is almost always a mistake. They were going way down hill towards the end with 0141 and they should have stayed down. This track is just candy-arsed, radio friendly pop s**t and as far from rock as you could possibly get. I see them fading away again very soon. Sadly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

